Experiment

Consequence Preview

Help people understand likely consequences, obligations and uncertainty before they commit.

External userPolicyNow -> Next
KNOWREMEMBERUSEEXCHANGELEARNANTICIPATE

01

Problem to address

People often discover important obligations, costs, conflicts or risks after they have already committed. The expensive failure is not lack of prediction but lack of usable foresight at the decision point.

02

What the evidence tells us

Farmers want to know eligibility before applying, and fear later penalties. They also need to understand whether something will work on their land and what it will cost over time. The real ask is to see the consequence before committing.

03

The proposition to explore

The idea

Show people the important known consequences, obligations and uncertainties of a choice before they commit to it.

04

Hypothesis

If users can see the important known consequences and uncertainties before committing, they will make better-informed choices and fewer cases will fail later because obligations were misunderstood.

05

How it could work

At a consequential choice, assemble current rules, known interactions, time commitments, evidence requirements and relevant uncertainty into a plain-language preview. Where possible, let users compare alternatives side by side.

06

Example: bring it to life

Before selecting a farming intervention, the farmer sees expected payment, length of commitment, evidence they will need, interaction with existing agreements, known maintenance obligations and how strong the suitability evidence is for their land.

07

AI opportunity

AI can explain complex rules and scenario differences in plain language. It should not imply certainty where outcomes depend on future events.

08

Potential value

  • Fewer avoidable surprises
  • Better-informed participation
  • Potentially higher trust
  • Reduced downstream support and disputes

09

Reduce uncertainty without overcommitting

Smallest meaningful experiment

Prototype consequence preview for one high-friction choice using current rules only. Test whether users identify obligations more accurately and feel more confident than with existing guidance.

10

Open questions and risks

What we still need to learn

  • Must distinguish known rules from uncertain outcomes
  • Too much information can overwhelm
  • Could be interpreted as a guarantee